Trump tariffs, as they’re colloquially dubbed, have driven the markets in the recent past. In August of 2019, the S&P 500 oscillated as the continuous news on trade deals became more unpredictable. On August 23rd, as President Trump called for American companies to find an alternative to China, the S&P 500 dropped nearly 3%.
Since August, the markets have dipped and climbed regularly. Furthermore, the trade tantrums have spread to Canada, Mexico and Europe. Some of these tariffs have been implemented, while others have been called off. This begs the question: What are the tariff effects, and what should I do about them?
Tariffs sound complicated. Simply put, they are taxes on imported goods. However, historical background is important. The first tariff was the Tariff of 1789, the second act of Congress.
There are two primary draws to tariffs. First, they are a revenue source for governments. Second, they can be used to protect trade (i.e., industries, companies, employees and consumers).
Going back to 1789, the United States was a fledgling nation with massive debt and little revenue. It had a massive trade imbalance with Great Britain and other nations. Because the nation hadn’t created taxes and therefore had little income, the U.S. government created the Tariff Act of 1789. However, it was not without controversy.
It pitted much of the North (manufacturing sector) against much of the South (agricultural sector). Northern manufacturers favored high tariffs to protect their industries against foreign competition, while Southern plantations desired low or no tariffs to protect the exportation of cotton, tobacco, etc. Herein lies a root problem with tariffs: it pits winners against losers.
Tariffs are less important to our government revenues today than they were in 1789. From the late 1700s through mid-1800s, tariffs represented a significant part of the federal budget, often nearing 90% to 95%. Today, they represent about 1%.
As witnessed by our history, trade tariffs tend to be helpful for nations that aren’t competitive and need to protect themselves. However, they create winners and losers as one country retaliates and imposes reciprocal tariffs (often on other goods and services). Let’s take a closer look at two potential tariff effects.
Tit-for-tat trade talk tantrums can escalate into a trade war. Perhaps one of the worst trade wars in our history came after the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs of 1929 (signed in 1930). These tariffs were started to protect the agricultural industry. As populism won out, it soon turned into tariffs on over 800 products when numerous other industries wanted in on the protectionism game. Many economists believe that the ensuing retaliatory tariffs and consequential trade wars contributed to the Great Depression.
It should also be noted that China’s (and other nations) tariff responses are directed at industries and corresponding states that voted in favor of Trump in the past election. We believe that the administration will realize that it cannot afford to abandon the recent economic gains that came about from reformed tax policy with a potential recession created by tariffs.
Among the hardest hit would be farm states–Iowa, South Dakota and Nebraska—that rely heavily on exports of grains like soybeans and corn, and states that are major producers of a variety of other impacted goods—Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana and Ohio. These and other states that would be negatively impacted turned out for President Trump in the 2016 presidential election.
And, in the past year, Democrats won in various regular and special elections in districts that Trump won in 2016. Trump tariffs will be a hot issue in the upcoming 2020 election.
From a fundamental perspective, these tariffs in isolation are not that impactful relative to the size of our economy. In fact, they are counterbalanced by recent stimulus packages, including recent tax cuts, government spending and corporate tax repatriation. This is not to say that Mr. Stock Market will pay attention to these facts. Markets can be very irrational. It is also important to note that bond markets indicate a possible recession, but experts don’t advise investors to make impulsive decisions based on market volatility.
Going forward, tariffs need to be closely monitored for their true impact—good and bad. We find some comfort that these tariff announcements and trade tariff talk tantrums may just be posturing and short-lived. And while it is apparent that we need to take a stronger stance against some of China’s bad trade practices, we are hopeful that this will be addressed through direct negotiations and by the World Trade Organization.
[Editor’s Note: To learn more about this and related topics, you may want to attend the following webinar: Trade Finance Basics. This is an updated version of an article originally published on June 17, 2018.]
Reed serves as the Chief Investment Officer to Calamos Wealth Management, overseeing all aspects of the firm’s investment platform, including internal and external solutions, and working with the firm’s biggest clients. Calamos is an industry leading wealth and investment management organization with a national presence.
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.