Business valuation is both a science and an art. First, one has to understand the methods of valuation. Then, one has to understand that there are different ways to apply each method.
Differences in application arise because business valuation professionals (human beings) are responsible for the application and, thus, their judgments influence the way they apply a given methodology.
Ultimately, the valuation of a company is an attempt to estimate the market value of a business. Market value is generally defined as the price point at which a transaction occurs between a willing buyer and a willing seller, both having all relevant facts and neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell. The oddity with any market price is that one party sells at the price where another party buys, and both parties think they’re smarter than the other. When multiple parties come together with different views of the economic and industry environments and different views with respect to the outlook of a particular company, estimating the value of that company becomes a matter of significant judgment.
In the context of business valuation, there are three valuation approaches:
The concept of the income approach is to consider the future earnings and cash flow capacity of the business and to discount those future cash flows to a present value.
The concept of the market approach is to consider market prices of either similar publicly traded companies or similar acquired companies and apply that pricing to the subject company through the use of multiples (e.g., enterprise value-to-earnings before interest taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) or price-to-earnings).
The concept of the cost approach is to consider the value of all of the underlying assets and liabilities of a business. The cost approach is not typically used in the valuation of an operating business as it is difficult to discretely value the intangible values of a business. It is, however, often considered for asset holding companies (e.g., real estate holding companies) and can be considered as a floor value of a company.
This article discusses the application of the income and market approaches, considering the areas of judgment that often result in differences of opinion among valuation practitioners and regulatory bodies. In addition, this article focuses on the application to the value of an entire business. Valuing specific ownership interests in businesses requires consideration of the rights and restrictions of those ownership interests, and is beyond the scope of this article. If you find this article a bit complex or a little over your head, take a look at this article first, and then come back and re-read this one.
The income approach is most commonly executed using a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) methodology. The first step is to estimate the future cash flows over some discrete period. The discrete period should reflect a forecast of the cash flows of the business over whatever period is required until the business is expected to operate in a normalized state. Many valuation practitioners consider a 5-year period, although this can vary based on the facts and circumstances of the business.
The discrete period cash flows are then discounted using an appropriate cost of capital, which is the rate of return required by a hypothetical investor to attract an investment in the business. Lastly, a terminal value is added, which should reflect the value of the business after the discrete forecast period. The terminal value can be determined either through a financial estimation that involves the cost of capital and long-term growth rate (the Gordon Growth Method) or through the application of a valuation multiple to a terminal year financial measure (e.g., EBITDA). In other words, practitioners estimate the value of the business as it expects to operate in perpetuity using either an estimate of the long-term growth rate or an appropriate valuation multiple.
At each step along the execution of the income approach, there are numerous areas of judgment:
The market approach is typically executed using two similar methodologies: the guideline company method and the guideline transaction method.
The guideline company method involves obtaining market information for publicly-traded companies that are considered to be most similar to the subject company. Using this data, valuation practitioners compute various market multiples, which can include:
Multiples such as these can be computed for the guideline companies across various time periods (e.g., latest twelve months, latest fiscal year, projected fiscal year, etc.) and then applied to the corresponding financial measure for the subject company.
The areas of judgment where valuation practitioners will often vary include the selection of the guideline companies, the types of multiples, and the time periods. In addition, no two companies are exactly alike and consideration should be given to making adjustments to the market multiples and the earnings measures to account for differences between the public guideline companies and the subject company. For example, the guideline companies may be more mature businesses and have lower growth outlooks than the subject company. In this case, consideration should be given to increasing the market multiple applied to the subject company to account for its enhanced growth prospects. Adjustments could also be made for risk, asset intensity, tax differences, non-operating assets, etc. These adjustments leave significant room for judgment.
An additional factor that is typically considered when applying the Guideline Company Method concerns the application of a control premium. The stock prices of publicly-traded companies reflect the price paid for a single share of stock, where the owner has no effective control over the operations of a company. When public companies are acquired, the price paid is typically a premium to the current market price for a single share. Some of this premium may reflect the ability of a buyer to exercise control over the business and direct its cash flows, etc. As such, many practitioners apply a control premium to the market prices of the stock of the guideline companies. The application and estimation of this premium is a factor that has been debated within the valuation community, and it remains a significant element of the judgment that impacts estimated values of businesses.
The guideline transaction method is similar to the guideline company method in many respects. Rather than consider the price of similar publicly-traded companies, it considers the available information related to companies that have been acquired. If estimable, multiples of revenue, EBITDA, EBIT, etc. are calculated and applied to the corresponding financial measures of the subject company. In addition to the subjective nature of choosing the guideline transactions, which multiples to apply, and the adjustments to the multiples, this approach is often further troubled by the limited and inconsistent nature of the available data related to acquired companies.
The application of the income and market approaches have many areas of subjective judgment that practitioners make based on their experience and knowledge. Consideration and reconciliation of multiple approaches allows practitioners to gain confidence in their valuation conclusions, but the subjective nature of many of the assumptions make valuing a business more of an art than a science.
Editor’s Note: To learn more on this subject, we also suggest this webinar and this webinar on business valuation. You may also be interested in this webinar about selling your business and this one focusing on valuing your soft assets.
Steve Fischoff is a Senior Director with Alvarez & Marsal Valuation Services in Chicago specializing in the valuation of businesses and business interests including equity interests, liabilities and debt, options and derivatives, intellectual property and other tangible and intangible assets. His primary areas of concentration are providing opinions of value for financial reporting, tax planning…
Effective Private Company Board Strategies Drive Goals to Completion
Could Overconfidence Hold You Back As a Leader?
Communications (In)decency Acts? Section 230 Governs the Online World
Make Outreach Effective Fast: Learn How to Use Facebook Ads
Effective Outside Directors Provide Leadership When It Is Needed Most
Breaking the Cycle of Arrogance and Eliminating Unethical Company Culture
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new window. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.