Running a business often requires more cash than you have on hand. Whether it’s covering payroll, buying inventory, or waiting for customers to pay their invoices, the need for working capital never goes away. Traditional bank loans are one option, but they aren’t always available, especially for smaller businesses or those with less-than-perfect credit. Enter alternative financing.
Three of the most common alternative financing options are factoring, purchase order financing, and merchant cash advances. Each provides quick access to cash but works differently and comes with its own legal considerations and risks.
Under a factoring arrangement, a company sells its accounts receivable, i.e., unpaid invoices, to a factor (a financing company) at a discount. The factor then collects the money directly from the customers when the invoices come due.
As Harvey Gross of HSG Services explains, “Factoring is not a loan; it’s an advance against your receivables. The risk shifts to the factor, depending on how the deal is structured.”
Factoring gives businesses immediate liquidity without waiting for invoice payment. It’s especially useful in industries like trucking, manufacturing, or staffing, where payroll and supplier costs hit before clients pay.
There are two types of factoring:
Factoring can also shift administrative burdens. Factors often handle collections, monitor customer payment behavior, and assume some credit risk management responsibilities. This allows businesses to focus on operations rather than chasing receivables. On the downside, customers may be notified of the factoring arrangement, which can affect client relationships if not managed carefully.
From a legal standpoint, factoring agreements should clearly spell out what happens in the event of disputes or late payments. Some agreements allow factors to ‘charge back’ invoices, essentially reversing the transaction. Business owners should also be aware that recourse factoring may leave them responsible for invoices that go bad.
Sometimes the challenge isn’t collecting payment, it’s fulfilling the order in the first place.
Under a purchase order (PO) financing arrangement, the financing company pays the business’s supplier directly for the goods. Once the business delivers the finished product and invoices the customer for payment, the arrangement is typically converted into a factoring deal to pay off the PO financing. The cycle ends when the customer pays, the factor gets reimbursed, and the business pockets the remainder.
PO financing is especially common among importers, distributors, and wholesalers that operate on thin margins but handle large volume orders. Without PO financing, many growing companies would be forced to turn down lucrative contracts.
As Jennifer Draffkorn of Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. notes, “PO financing is about giving companies the ability to say yes to opportunities they otherwise couldn’t afford.”
However, PO financing can be expensive. Rates are higher than bank loans, and fees accumulate as the financing rolls into factoring. Businesses considering PO financing must weigh the costs carefully. PO financing fees are layered on top of factoring fees, creating a ‘double dip’ effect. The economics work best when profit margins are comfortably above financing costs. Legal diligence includes confirming supplier reliability and customer creditworthiness. Disputes about shipment delays or defective products can leave the business on the hook even after funds are advanced.
Merchant cash advances (MCAs) became popular in the early 2000s, starting with companies that had high credit card sales. Today, they’ve expanded to almost every type of small business.
Under an MCA arrangement, the financing provider advances a business cash in exchange for a percentage of its future receivables. Payments are usually collected daily or weekly through ACH debits from the business’s bank account. Unlike loans, MCAs are technically structured as sales of receivables, which is why they often aren’t subject to state usury laws.
MCAs appeal because approval is fast, sometimes within 24 to 48 hours, and providers often require minimal paperwork. Credit history is less important than cash flow, which makes them accessible to businesses shut out of bank lending. However, the speed and flexibility come at a cost.
The effective annual percentage rate (APR) can be enormous, sometimes exceeding 100%. They can trap businesses in a cycle of debt, especially if the business doesn’t grow fast enough to cover the daily repayments.
As Michael Weis of Weis Burney LLC warns, “MCAs are marketed as quick and easy cash, but they come at a steep price if you don’t understand the repayment terms.”
Critics argue that MCA providers sometimes exploit desperate businesses. High APRs and daily ACH withdrawals can strain cash flow to the breaking point. A company might find itself in a cycle of taking one MCA to pay off another, creating a debt spiral. Legal disputes often arise over whether these transactions are true sales of receivables or disguised loans subject to state usury laws.
As Jacqueline Brooks of Duane Morris LLP notes, “These tools aren’t one-size-fits-all. The right choice depends on your business model, your margins, and your risk tolerance.”
When comparing options, businesses should look beyond the straight cost. Control provisions, personal guarantees, and the effect on customer relationships all matter. While factoring may involve customers dealing directly with a factor, PO financing usually remains behind the scenes.
Alternative financing can provide critical breathing room for businesses that need cash quickly. Factoring, PO financing, and MCAs all serve different purposes, but none are free of risk. The smartest business owners use them with eyes wide open by understanding the legal terms, calculating the true costs, and aligning the financing with their long-term goals.
When considering any form of alternative financing, remember to:
To learn more about this topic, view Alternative Structures: PO Financing, Factoring, and MCA. The quoted remarks referenced in this article were made either during this webinar or shortly thereafter during post-webinar interviews with the panelists. Readers may also be interested to read other articles about business finance.
This article was originally published on September 30, 2025.
©2025. DailyDACTM, LLC d/b/a/ Financial PoiseTM. This article is subject to the disclaimers found here.
Financial Poise helps trusted advisors (accountants, attorneys, business brokers, consultants, financial advisors, investment bankers, etc.) by providing a meritocracy-based platform on which to demonstrate their thought leadership. The thought leadership of these advisors is expressed in the form of educational articles, so we can provide our readers high-quality, unbiased education about investing, owning a business…