This story will be featured in the upcoming Financial Poise Weekly newsletter.
Last year, Google was found to have illegally monopolized key parts of the online ad tech market. But it just scored a major victory over what should be done about it: a federal judge ruled last Wednesday that Google won’t have to break up its ad tech business and must instead change some of its business practices.
David McCabe and Tripp Mickle from The New York Times explain:
So, why does this matter? Because the ruling is another setback for federal regulators trying to curb Big Tech through structural breakups. Google has now been declared a monopolist in two major federal cases (ad tech and search) without judges ordering significant structural changes to the company. McCabe and Mickle flag that the FTC also lost its monopoly case against Meta last year, while cases against Amazon and Apple are still ahead.
Our take? The bigger win for Google is what this ruling allows it to do next. While its ad tech business is slowly losing importance, Google is pouring billions into AI infrastructure, integrating AI into products like Search, and gaining ground against OpenAI and Anthropic. And it can now pursue that next chapter with its broader business largely intact.
Ultimately, this was a win for Big Tech. Regulators may be succeeding in proving that some of these companies have monopoly power, but actually curbing their power is proving much harder.
Financial Poise helps trusted advisors (accountants, attorneys, business brokers, consultants, financial advisors, investment bankers, etc.) by providing a meritocracy-based platform on which to demonstrate their thought leadership. The thought leadership of these advisors is expressed in the form of educational articles, so we can provide our readers high-quality, unbiased education about investing, owning a business…