“Risky Business” is:
A) The title of a big Hollywood hit from the early 1980s that launched actor Tom Cruise to stardom and recorded a spectacular $63.5 million gross;
B) A description of what investing in movies may be faced with when putting money into Hollywood projects; or
Well, if the vibe coming from China is any indication, the answer to that question is B. Though the Hollywood dream machine has long held a strong allure for many would-be investors, the retreat of Chinese money from Hollywood is the latest blow to legacy studios and investing in movies in general.
In 2016, Chinese investment in the U.S. entertainment industry hit $4.78 billion, the Los Angeles Times reported. As of the fall of 2017, however, the Times reported that investments had plummeted to just $489 million, according to research firm Rhodium Group. China’s leaders have tightened control on money, leaving the country fearful that the outflow of capital could weaken its economy.
As of the fall of 2017…[Chinese] investments had plummeted to just $489 million
“For now, everybody’s laying low,” Los Angeles movie producer Scott Einbinder told the LA Times. “There’s still definitely business being done, but it’s been constrained quite a bit.”
Einbinder’s company, Cristal Pictures, is backed by Hong Kong’s East Light Media.
With China retreating from any substantial involvement, there is a vacuum that has largely gone unfilled by foreign investors. This has forced the industry to look for more domestic sources that may be interested in investing in movies. Paramount, for example, signed co-financing deals with Santa Monica-based David Ellison’s Skydance Media and with Rhode Island’s Hasbro.
“From where we’re sitting, foreign financing seems to be fairly quiet,” Guillaume de Chalenda, global head of media and entertainment for Bank Leumi, the U.S. division of Israel’s Leumi Group, told the Times. “There are a lot of stories of Chinese investment getting canceled, and there’s not an obvious source of capital to replace that.”
That’s not to say that there is a shortage of capital in the film and TV business. Rather, the changing face of the industry and how people are consuming their entertainment has changed the game for Hollywood. Its legacy studios are at risk of being left behind.
According to the same Los Angeles Times article, Netflix is expected to spend $8 billion on content in 2018, including licensed material and originals—up from $6 billion in 2017. Apple has put forth $1 billion to invest in movies and original shows in 2018.
To illustrate just how powerful companies like Netflix have become, the National Alliance of Theater Owners recently announced that movie theater attendance hit a 24-year low in 2017 — with historic lows reached for Memorial Day and Labor Day weekends — continuing the downward trend since 2005, as reported by The Wrap. Ticket prices rose some 4 percent.
Netflix is expected to spend $8 billion on content in 2018, including licensed material and originals—up from $6 billion in 2017
While things in 2018 may look bleak for the Hollywood entertainment industry, it still grosses $11 billion a year, the Wrap reported. Investors can still make money.
“It’s an industry where you have to know what you’re doing to make money in it,” said Michael Maduell, president of research firm Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. “They [sovereign wealth funds] are getting an inside look at what’s working and not working.”
You may also be interested in “Amid Stock Market Volatility, Investment in Hollywood can Beat the Odds.”
Industry estimates indicate that 60% or more of movies produced each year are box-office dogs. So what’s the appeal? When a movie hits, it can hit big. Films such as “The Blind Side” (which cost $35 million but earned $221 million in the U.S.), “The Hangover” (produced for $35 million and earned $242 million after production costs) and “My Big Fat Greek Wedding” (produced for $5 million but grossed $369 million worldwide) prove the point.
Yet, for every hit, there are as many, if not more, misses. While movies are an alternative investment offering a hedge against stock market volatility, any allocation to a big-screen project demands caution.
Wade Bradley is a venture capitalist whose companies — first IndieVest and now Media Society — solicit investments in independent films they produce and distribute through a subsidiary.
“It is a business,” Bradley told the Los Angeles Times in 2014. “If you have an end-game managed risk strategy and mitigate risk at the front end and manage risk through the production and distribution, it is a business that can be highly profitable.”
In addition to the profit motive, investors also get perks like trips to the Sundance Film Festival, Oscar parties and visits to movie sets.
The nature of investing, however, suggests that things don’t always come up roses.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, a 2016 lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court by three IndieVest investors accuses Bradley of trying to dodge his debts by closing down IndieVest and creating Media Society, which they say is a continuation of the company that owes them over a $1 million.
Bradley, for his part, said the suit is without merit.
“The allegations regarding IndieVest are old news and were previously arbitrated by a three-judge FINRA consumer panel in 2015, which denied all of the claims in their entirety,” he told The Hollywood Reporter. “We are confident this litigation will be dismissed and will not have any impact on Media Society. We are proud of what we are doing with Media Society and we are excited about our future.”
As for China, experts believe it is just a matter of time before the nation once again allows money to flow to places like Hollywood.
“While Chinese money is indeed restricted and has been for the last year, it doesn’t mean the spigot has stopped,” said attorney John Burke, who handles film financing deals. “Studios have to worry about who their next partners are going to be, but it’s not like, ‘Oh my God, where do I finance my next film?’ They have capital. The question is, what’s going to be the next wave? We haven’t seen it yet.”
Prior to joining Financial Poise as an editor, Bryan worked as both a reporter and editor for multiple publications, and, for the past two and a half years, he has served as publisher and editor of Real Media, the parent company of peekskillpost.net.
Beware Venture Capital Unicorns- Risks Look Greater than Potential Rewards
Beyond the Fringe: The Evolution of Mainstream Alternative Investments
Exploring Risk-Reward Tradeoffs in Venture Capital Investment Opportunities
Swimming in the “Shark Tank”: Is Reality TV Investing the Real Deal?
Leonardo DiCaprio Investments Stay Afloat in Spite of Choppy Waters
Gold Investments Remain a Stable Choice Despite Economic Uncertainty
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new window. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.