“We continue to believe that auto as an asset class is extremely robust. Not only are contracts underwritten in the knowledge that the asset’s value will depreciate but also vehicles are easy to repossess and have an intrinsic tangible value…”
Evercore ISI research, as quoted in by CNBC
My take: This may be right in the short-term, but it’s dead wrong in the medium-term and beyond. Let me explain why.
First, a bit of context: the quote above comes from an article about rising default rates on auto subprime loans. If you are interested in auto investments, you can find a similar, more readable article on the subject here.
The fact that Uber and Lyft already decimated taxi medallion prices in city after city makes me scratch my head in wonder. How do analysts not see the handwriting on the wall? Self-driving car technology only builds on the Uber/Lyft revolution in changing the automobile landscape (figuratively and literally) as much as the introduction of mass assembly line production.
Viable, mass marketed self-driving cars are not that far away (this is an excellent website that tracks the technological aspect).
The technology is, of course, just half the equation; the legalization of self-driving cars is the other. That said, today’s governments move quickly enough to keep up with the technology (here and here are excellent websites that track things from legislative perspective).
Getting back to comparing the advent of self-driving cars to the advent of the car itself, recall the far-reaching effects on the economy when the auto industry underwent its last revolution:
The speed of change only increased with the Federal-Aid Highway Act in 1956, which lead to tens of thousands of miles of networked interstate highways.
Studies suggest that Uber, Lyft and ‘gig economy’ service providers don’t negatively impact on car ownership in any significant way. That sounds right to me, but Uber is only eight years old.
Most American households continued to have a landline telephone in their homes until about 2004 even though 2/3 of all U.S. adults owned cell phones by 2004. Today, though, only about 40-50% of households have a landline. [Here, here and here for support]
My point: Uber and Lyft have not yet changed everything, but they might. When they do, what will change?
Will auto manufacturers have to make fewer cars? Will many parking lots have to be re-purposed? Will the value of older cars that lenders may need to repossess crash? I think, with respect to each question, the answer is yes.
Personally, when I can press a button on my phone for a driverless car and have one arrive only minutes later, to take me wherever I want while I can read a book, I really don’t think I will want the expense and bother of owning my own car. And that day is not so far off…
I’m staying away from investing in taxi medallions, subprime auto debt and REITs that focus on parking lots.
Then sign up to receive our weekly Financial Poise newsletter, our take on the most relevant and topical business, financial and legal issues affecting investors and small business owners.
Always Plain English. Always Objective. Always FREE.
Jonathan Friedland is a partner with Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Hammer, a law firm with offices in Chicago and New York City. Born and raised in a New York suburb, Friedland graduated SUNY-Albany magna cum laude in three years and then earned his law degree from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Friedland clerked for…
Accredited Investors: Know Your Online Securities Intermediary
Critical Considerations When Selecting a Private Equity Manager
Can You Get Wealthy Buying Farmland as an Investment?
Super Gains for Superheroes? Check out Investing in Comics
Kenny G Investing in Stuff is Good Entertainment- and Good Business
Beyond the Fringe: The Evolution of Mainstream Alternative Investments
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new window. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.